How does Hill present childish behaviour in I’m the King of the Castle? Essay

pile presents young deportment through the subprogram of dialogue, description and structure. She highlights that immature behaviour is a characteristic of adults, as well as the children. There argon numerous examples of infantile behaviour throughout the unused, for example when Hooper and Kingshaw fight everyplace a toy, or when Hooper soils himself.One way in which agglomerate presents immature behaviour is by and by an incident where Hooper and Kingshaw are fighting oer a toy fort during that affray Kingshaw chirrups Its mine, its mine, Hills routine of dialogue is interesting here because the use of a tri colon non just now emphasises the intensity of Kingshaws emotional reaction, (furthered by the fact he is fighting over a toy) hardly similarly echoes that chant deal whines of small children. The importance of this bank bill is signalled through the use of italics, which suggests that there is a degree of stress on Kingshaw whilst he speaks, again like a c hild. some other way that Hill explores puerility in the unused is through her description of Hooper alter himself Hill describes a dark ruin speckle of puddle in the rampart of Hoopers jeans. Hills use of the reciprocation stain delineates an image of dirt and even sickness to the proofreader, the reader is hence disgusted. Furthermore the reader erect perceive the word pee to relate towards a lack of control, like a child. What is interesting to note is that the word pee is highlighted before the more scientific word groin, this highlights Kingshaws childish nature. This quote fits in the context of this novel because it is based upon power struggles between 2 children Hill exposes the fact that although Hooper is initially presented as a powerful figure, he is unbosom a child.Finally Hill not only presents the children in Im the King of the Castle as childish, entirely excessively presents the adults as childish. It butt joint be argued that when Mrs Helena Kings haw felt a lilliputian ashamed of not wanting to convey Charles with her- she is behaving in a childish manner. Hill uses the words not wanting to portray Mrs Kingshaw as a self-serving individual, absent-minded of her tidingss needs this is arguably a childish quality. Hills use of collocation highlights the phrase not wanting, her selfish qualities prioritise over that of her own son this is especially self, and comparable to little children. Mrs Kingshaw also displays a lack of empathy, as taken in the previous quote young children also have a lack of empathy until they bring on older, and hence this quality is a childish quality.In conclusion Hill presents childishness or immaturity in the novel through her use of dialogue, description and structure. Hill emphasises childish behaviour that is associated between Hooper and Kingshaw, but also points out the adults are evenly susceptible to such behaviour. Perhaps she is criticising parenting styles to show the reader the n egative impact it can have on children. Her use of agree structure is also ironic as it suggests that such negative qualities are passed on through generations. However, the parallel structure can also be reparative and predictable at times.